Compound Interest Calculator
Final balance
$144,573
- You put in$58,000
- Interest earned$86,573
How this was worked out
- Rate per period7% ÷ 12 = 0.5833%
- Number of periods12 × 20 = 240
- Total paid in$10,000 at the start, plus $200 a month = $58,000
- Interest is the difference$144,573 − $58,000 = $86,573
Year by year
| Year | Paid in | Interest | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $12,400 | $801 | $13,201 |
| 2 | $14,800 | $1,834 | $16,634 |
| 3 | $17,200 | $3,115 | $20,315 |
| 4 | $19,600 | $4,662 | $24,262 |
| 5 | $22,000 | $6,495 | $28,495 |
| 6 | $24,400 | $8,633 | $33,033 |
| 7 | $26,800 | $11,100 | $37,900 |
| 8 | $29,200 | $13,918 | $43,118 |
| 9 | $31,600 | $17,114 | $48,714 |
| 10 | $34,000 | $20,714 | $54,714 |
| 11 | $36,400 | $24,747 | $61,147 |
| 12 | $38,800 | $29,246 | $68,046 |
| 13 | $41,200 | $34,244 | $75,444 |
| 14 | $43,600 | $39,776 | $83,376 |
| 15 | $46,000 | $45,882 | $91,882 |
| 16 | $48,400 | $52,603 | $101,003 |
| 17 | $50,800 | $59,983 | $110,783 |
| 18 | $53,200 | $68,070 | $121,270 |
| 19 | $55,600 | $76,915 | $132,515 |
| 20 | $58,000 | $86,573 | $144,573 |
Compounding arithmetic, nothing more, and not investment advice. The rate is the one you typed and it never moves — no investment pays the same return every period, and no savings account holds its rate for twenty years. The balance is in future money rather than today’s: at 3% inflation a figure twenty years out buys a little over half what it appears to. Tax on the interest and any account or fund fee are taken before you get there, and the monthly addition never rises.
Additions are credited at the end of each compounding period, so a less frequent compounding setting earns less on the money paid in during the period. Monthly additions under yearly compounding earn nothing until the year turns.
The worked examples below are in US dollars. The tool itself works in whichever currency you pick above, and never converts between them — what you type is what it does the arithmetic on.
What compounding actually buys you
Compound interest is interest paid on interest already earned. Over a year it is barely visible; over twenty it is usually the majority of the balance. This calculator projects a starting amount plus a regular monthly addition forward at a chosen return, and — more usefully — splits the final balance into the part you paid in and the part the growth added, which is the comparison that makes the case for starting early.
A worked example: $10,000 and $200 a month
Start with $10,000, add $200 a month, assume a 7% annual return compounded monthly, and run it for 20 years. The projected balance is $144,572.72. You paid in $58,000 of that — the original $10,000 plus 240 contributions of $200 — so $86,572.72 is growth. Sixty per cent of the final pot is money you never earned at work.
The shape of the curve matters more than the endpoint. After one year the balance is $13,201.42, of which only $801.42 is interest. After ten years it is $54,713.58 with $20,713.58 of interest. The second decade adds roughly $90,000; the first added roughly $45,000, on nearly identical contributions.
The formula and the frequency
For each period the calculator multiplies the balance by (1 + r), where r is the annual rate divided by the number of compounding periods in a year, then adds that period’s contribution. Repeat for every period. With no contributions this collapses to the textbook form A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt).
Compounding frequency is a real but modest effect. Take $10,000 at 7% for 10 years with no additions: compounded yearly it reaches $19,671.51, twice a year $19,897.89, quarterly $20,015.97, monthly $20,096.61, and daily $20,136.18. The whole distance from annual to daily is about $465 on $10,000 — worth knowing, and much smaller than a half-point difference in the rate itself.
How contributions are handled
Contributions are entered monthly but spread evenly across whatever compounding frequency you choose, so the two settings can differ without the total paid in changing. Choose yearly compounding with $200 a month and the calculator credits $2,400 once a year rather than pretending you saved nothing; the timing shifts, the amount does not.
The assumptions that will not hold
The projection applies a single, constant return every single period. No real investment does this. A fund averaging 7% delivers it as a scatter of years between roughly −40% and +30%, and the order those years arrive in changes the outcome — badly so if the poor years land late, when the balance is large.
Also absent: tax on interest, dividends or gains; platform and fund fees, which are typically charged as a percentage of the balance and so scale with the number this page is showing you; and inflation, which means the final figure is in future dollars, not today’s. A 7% nominal return with 2.5% inflation is about 4.4% real. For a projection that shows both, use the retirement calculator, which discounts the result back to today’s money.
Picking a rate, and how often it compounds
What return should I assume?
There is no correct answer, only a defensible range. Broad equity indices have historically returned roughly 7% a year after inflation over very long periods, cash savings far less. Run the projection two or three times at different rates: the spread between them tells you more than any single number.
Does compounding more often make a real difference?
Less than most people expect. On the example above, moving from annual to daily compounding on $10,000 over 10 years adds about $465. The contribution amount and the time horizon each move the result by far more.
Why does the interest column start so small?
Because interest is charged on the balance, and in year one the balance is mostly your own recent deposits, which have had no time to earn anything. The example earns $801.42 of interest in year one and $9,658.02 in year twenty, on the same $2,400 of contributions each year.
What is the rule of 72?
A shortcut for doubling time: divide 72 by the annual return and you have roughly the number of years it takes. At 7% that is a little over ten, which the worked example bears out, and it is close enough to sanity-check any projection before you trust its decimals.
Does it matter whether I contribute at the start or the end of a month?
A little. Money paid in at the start of a period earns that period’s return, so contributing on the first rather than the last of the month adds about one extra period of growth across the whole run — a fraction of a per cent, not a decision to agonise over.
Should the return I type be before or after inflation?
Either, so long as you read the answer in the same terms: a nominal rate gives a balance in future money, a real rate gives one in today’s.