Loading Note Word Target…
Optional. Words in a sitting you have actually done, not the one you wish you did.
173 words
1,900 words still to write across 11 writing days, the last of them Fri 28 Aug 2026.
The daily figure is rounded up, because writing 249 words a day against a 249.4 requirement finishes a few hundred words light and nobody notices until the end. Word counts are not a measure of work done, either — a good afternoon can take the total downwards, and this will read that as going backwards. Treat it as a pacing check on a first draft rather than as a score.
Words still needed, divided by days still available. That is the whole calculation, and it takes a line of arithmetic. Everything interesting about a tool like this lives in the cases where the division should not be performed at all, because those are the cases real people actually type in: the deadline that went past on Tuesday, the draft that is already over length, the deadline that is today, the week where every day has been spoken for. A calculator that prints minus four hundred words a day, or the word Infinity, has failed at the only part of the job that required any thought.
A piece that has to reach 2,500 words with 600 already drafted leaves 1,900 to write. Spread across eleven writing days — today, the submission date, and the nine between them — that is 173 words a day, which the tool rounds up rather than down. Round the other way and eleven days of 172 words finishes eleven words light, which nobody notices until the count at the end.
Block out the two weekend days that fall inside that stretch and the eleven writing days become nine, so the daily figure climbs to 212. That climb is the useful part. It is the difference between a target that describes your week and one that describes a calendar, and it is the reason the day count is a control rather than a constant.
There is a second, more truthful question the daily figure cannot answer: not how much you need to write, but whether that is a quantity you have ever managed. Enter a rate you have genuinely hit in a sitting and the tool works the arithmetic backwards, reporting how many writing days the piece needs at that speed and whether they fit inside the deadline.
When they fit, the leftover days are named explicitly, because those days are where revision happens and a first draft finished on the morning of submission is not really finished. When they do not fit, the shortfall is given in days rather than as encouragement, which leaves you deciding between raising the rate and reclaiming one of the days you had written off.
Being past the required length is treated as an answer rather than an error. The tool reports the overshoot and says the remaining work is cutting rather than writing, which is a genuinely different activity and often a slower one. Progress is also shown uncapped: a draft at 118 per cent reads as 118 per cent, because rounding it back to a tidy 100 would hide exactly the material that has to come out.
It is a measure of volume and nothing else. A strong editing session can take the total downwards, and this tool will read that as going backwards, which tells you something about the tool and nothing about the afternoon. Word counts also say nothing about whether the argument holds, whether the sources are read, or whether the introduction still matches the conclusion. Use the daily figure as a pacing check on a first draft, and stop consulting it entirely once the drafting is done.
Because rounding down accumulates a deficit across every day of the plan and lands the draft short at the end. Rounding up costs a handful of extra words a day and guarantees the target is reached on time.
Dividing outstanding work by negative time produces a figure that looks like arithmetic and means nothing at all. The tool reports how many days ago the date went and how much is still unwritten, which is the only honest output left.
Follow whatever your department counts, and put that same number in here. Institutions differ on footnotes, block quotations and appendices, so a tool that decided this for you would be wrong for a large share of the people using it.
An even split is the simplest plan, not a claim about how anyone writes best. Treat the figure as a running check on whether the piece is on course, rather than a quota that has to be met identically on every single day.